Amongst all the “whys” I have asked myself while I was growing, the why’s related to Spirituality were the most predominant ones.
Q. Why does God have bad and evil things when he can remove it all ?
Q. Everything that is, has a beginning. If God made us then who made God? It has to begin at some point of time even if it is immortal

Q. If Universe was created then what existed before that and where that something did come from? Even the empty space would have a beginning. Where did the empty space come from ? If we go to the end of space can we touch the walls, the boundaries? What would that be? What would be on the other side?
Q. Why do we have pray and praise God to appease him. If he has everything then why are our prayers important to him?
Q. If all religions have different (and sometimes radically opposite) customs and traditions then which one is right? How do we know ours is right?
From then to now my pursuit for answers to these questions have brought me to consider very interesting ideas some proven and some which could not be proved.
These questions do not have definite answers but have multiple possibilities. I have been enriched every time I discovered a new possibility, a new perspective or a new dimension.
Like all inquisitive young minds I’ve pondered on what we call in theosophy as “The Problem of Evil” (POE). Problem of Evil is generally used by Atheist to prove that Gods do not exist. These methods as you will see below do not prove that God does not exist but it does attempt to prove that God is NOT omnipotent and he is NOT entirely Good.
Problem of Evil deals with questions like -
Why does pain and suffering exist on earth? Why do we have Evil when God can easily remove it with his omnipotence? I’m sure many millions of inquisitive children would have brooded on this questions a million times before some of them settled for answers their religion gave them, others became atheists. I have read tomes of theories and thoughts on this question and thought a blog post would be good to document the coherent parts of what I already think I know. Parts of this blog posts have been lifted from a various sources which I shall credit at the end of my post.
I’m neither religious nor atheist Or you can also say I’m religious as well as an atheist. God, for me is the process which manages or un-manages all the animate and inanimate things around us.
Theodicy is branch of theology that defends God's goodness and justice in the face of the existence of evil. A number of theodicies have been proposed and a good search on Google will get you some of the popular theodicy’s floating around. I present some of these theodicy’s, the atheist view and my personal viewpoint which I’ll try to present in a coherent and unambiguous manner but I’m more prone towards not succeeding in that attempt.
#1.Free Will Theodicy: Suffering exists because of our free will. God created evil so that we could then choose between good and evil, and make moral choices. If all choices result in good, there would be no moral choices. The free will theodicy holds that if love is acceptable, then it must be chosen over hate (or not-love), and therefore evil and suffering result when we make morally poor choices.
Atheist ViewFree Will does not require existence of evil or suffering. There is a lot of suffering which is not a result of free will like natural disasters, crime and discrimination. Also free will of one person can cause pain and suffering for another person. God should not allow moral choice of one person affect other beings as this goes against moral accountability. Therefore God is generally not good. He is unable to prevent Evil hence not omnipotent.
My View I Agree with the Free Will Theodicy.
Free Will means Freedom to exercise your options. Free will cannot exist without the existence of Bad options. That would be akin to censorship or a liquor prohibitory law. It’s necessary that Free Will has elements of both good and evil. A person chooses good or evil based on the moral path he wishes to pursue in this life (and probably an after-life). Having said that - what good is Free will, if someone judges the actions you took while you thought you were Free. It’s like saying you have the Free will to do anything you want but if you take advantage of it, I will punish you. God is then like a child who draws chalk line over an ant’s path and punishes whichever ant that crosses the line. I sincerely hope the God Government functions on more liberty than what we have in our Democratic government. So I set my conclusions on two possibilities –1) Free will with no strings attached and no afterlife to repent/correct Or 2) Free Will with reflection at the end of each life, guidance to understand mistakes, choose next life conditions and attempt to correct and pursue personal goals in the next life. I believe each one has a personal goal which is pursued over a period of countless lives. Why is all this required…something which I haven’t stumbled on yet.
#2. Experience Theodicy: Suffering exists because we need to experience it or have knowledge of it
This Theodicy tries to explain that suffering makes us stronger. Just like impure gold gets purer by melting it under high temperature. Just like we build stronger muscles by pumping iron, we become stronger by experiencing pain and suffering.
Atheist ViewGod could simply give us an innate knowledge of what evil is like, without us having to experience it. Don’t birds instinctively learn how to come of their eggs, Don’t fishes learn how to swim and humans babies learn how to open their eyes and cry as soon as they are born. Similarly an understanding of evil and destructive behavior could have been a part of instinctive knowledge. We have a lot of instinctive emotional reactions to pain and suffering. Human beings naturally vacillate towards reactions like vengeance, self-destruction or devastation when encountered by pain and suffering. The lesson intended to be learnt according to this theodicy is not learnt and the reaction causes more pain and suffering for others. Again we cannot even argue that all pain and suffering inflicted on humans or animals ends up in a lesson to be learnt. A fawn which burns to death in a forest fire, dies without any human being knowing about it. What is the lesson for the fawn? If I inflict pain on another human being How is that experience beneficial for that person? A God who lets its followers suffer like this is an Evil God or powerless to control pain and suffering.
My ViewPain and Suffering needs to be experienced so that we do not inflict the same on other fellow beings. Then there are Sadists and Masochists who find pleasure in experiencing and inflicting pain . If we need to get exposed to the entire gamut of sensory experiences then pain and suffering is definitely on the Top Ten. In the higher design of things pain, suffering and evilness are just absolute experiences like pleasure and goodness. Pain and Pleasure, Happiness and Sadness are experiences held at equal importance or equal unimportance. We Feel pain and suffering because we are endowed with the sensory apparatus to feel so. This is evident from the fact that there are some living creatures which do not feel any pain or pleasure atleast not in the way we do. Human emotions like envy, anger, retaliation, lust, pleasure, depravity can be experienced only in Human or closer to Human life forms. They cannot be interpreted outside of it. We need to understand that these are human interpretations and not something absolute. There are definite possibilities that there may be other life forms which have distinctively different life experiences and emotions that we cannot even comprehend.
If God has created the universe then it should have equal love and/or equal un-love (or hate) for all animate and inanimate things. Inanimate things are essential composed of the same structure of atoms as the animate hence their purpose is essentially the same i.e Flow of energy (and possible flowing or evolving into higher beings). We as individuals or as a group are too inconsequential amongst the multitude of beings and non-beings in this universe to be given preferential treatment or preferential attention. How can you justify that?. The cycle of creation and destruction encompasses us as well as all the animate and inanimate beings with equal consideration. If planets and stars can be created or destroyed for no fault of theirs, if trees can be allowed to cut for no fault, if crops, chickens and cattle can be allowed to be consumed for no fault of their then it is but natural that something equivalent is experienced by human beings too. Good creates whereas Evil un-creates, both are necessary for the flow of life and energy. Human beings need to understand this divine design and so choose and play their roles wisely.
#3. Absence Theodicy: Evil is simply the Absence of God/Good."God" is "goodness", anything not good such as evil and suffering, is the absence of God. Therefore, the absence theodicy claims that God is not responsible for evil, merely for good.
Permit me to copy-paste a popular email forward to explain this further :
"The professor of a university challenged his students with this question. "Did God create everything that exists?" A student answered bravely, "Yes, he did".
The professor then asked, "If God created everything, then he created evil. Since evil exists (as noticed by our own actions), so God is evil. The student couldn't respond to that statement causing the professor to conclude that he had "proved" that "belief in God" was a fairy tale, and therefore worthless.
Another student raised his hand and asked the professor, "May I pose a question? " "Of course" answered the professor. The young student stood up and asked : "Professor does Cold exists?" The professor answered, "What kind of question is that?...Of course the cold exists... haven't you ever been cold?" The young student answered, "In fact sir, Cold does not exist. According to the laws of Physics, what we consider cold, in fact is the absence of heat. Anything is able to be studied as long as it transmits energy (heat). Absolute Zero is the total absence of heat, but cold does not exist. What we have done is create a term to describe how we feel if we don't have body heat or we are not hot." "And, does Dark exist?", he continued. The professor answered "Of course". This time the student responded, "Again you're wrong, Sir. Darkness does not exist either. Darkness is in fact simply the absence of light. Light can be studied, darkness can not. Darkness cannot be broken down. A simple ray of light tears the darkness and illuminates the surface where the light beam finishes. Dark is a term that we humans have created to describe what happens when there's lack of light." Finally, the student asked the professor, "Sir, does evil exist?" The professor replied, "Of course it exists, as I mentioned at the beginning, we see violations, crimes and violence anywhere in the world, and those things are evil."
The student responded, "Sir, Evil does not exist. Just as in the previous cases, Evil is a term which man has created to describe the result of the absence of God's presence in the hearts of man.
After this, the professor bowed down his head, and didn't answer back.
The young man's name was ALBERT EINSTEIN."
Interesting story that was, but let me tell you that Albert Einstein’s name was added to this story much later after the original version was floating around for quite some time. None of historians have testified that the above quote is to be credited to Mr. Einstein.
Hoaxes apart but that was the explanation which would have hammered the point it ought to make clearly that Evil is Absence of Good (and Satan is absence of God).
Atheist ViewBut I thought God is everywhere. So how can he be conveniently absent from somewhere? If God is good and he should be everywhere, then why is he absent from hearts of some people, why is he absent in places where we have evil, pain and suffering. This paradox is insurmountable. Secondly, it does not still tell us why God made the scale of Good and Evil. We can experience these varying things because, God created them in the first place. If Good had existed everywhere (like God) then there is no point of having a case of “Absence of Good” in some places. God could have made happiness or goodness an absolute, not part of a scale. But God instead created evil by creating the good/evil dichotomy. So Either God is evil or he does not exist.
My ViewI agree that Evil is simply the absence of Good since both are labels based on interpretations. I do not agree that Evil is absence of God. God created evil or you could say that Humans created Evil and God allowed Humans the free will to manufacture Evil and to label it as such. So Evil does not mean absence of God but in fact it proves the presence of Free will allowed to us by God.
#4. The Divine Test Theodicy : God Tests us to see how we handle pain and suffering. Perhaps, if we pass this test. God will put us in heaven. Otherwise we remain on Earth or go to Hell. Most religions have the same beliefs. Our scriptures have countless stories of people being tested by God. In Buddhism such tests eventually lead us to Nirvana, in Islam the test is one of obedience to God, success takes you to Paradise.
Atheist ViewThis Theodicy actually admits that God created Evil since it was necessary for a Divine Test. Consider this …. God is all-knowing. It knows everything, future and past. God exists outside of time, and can see all future and past events as if they've all already happened. In fact this chain of events has all been created by God, from beginning to end. God is immovable, immutable, beyond time. As a result of all this, God clearly knows what tests we will pass and fail. God knows if we are largely moral or largely immoral. It knows why we transgress, and it knows in detail every reason and factor that ultimately causes us to go wrong.
God therefore never needs to test anyone. God knows, even without doing a test, what the results of the test will be. Let's say God wants to test someone by allowing them to stumble across a wallet in the street with money in it. Let's assume that God considers it best if the subject hands the wallet in to the police and worse if the subject steals the money and throws away the wallet. God knows if the person will pass such a test. God knows it because it created the person and their personality in the first place, so can work out what they will do. It also knows what the person will do because it is all-knowing, and knows all possible future events. God never needs to actually test the person, God already knows if they'll pass. To say that God needs or wants to "test" us is to say that God is not all-knowing.
The existence of suffering and evil, therefore, is clearly not excused by saying that God wants to test us. God knows, if it creates evil, who will pass its tests and who will fail. God doesn't need to actually create evil, suffering or unhappiness to know who will fail. Likewise, God does not need us to make moral choices in order to know if we're moral or not. God knows what we would choose if moral options are presented to us. The actual testing is not required, God already knows.
God could have created a world with no evil, no suffering, and no moral confusions. That way, everyone would be happy all the time, and we would rightly know that a loving God existed. God would still know, if it allowed transgression and evil, who would succumb to temptation. But the actual creation of potential evil is not necessary
God knows who will enter Heaven - so why does it keep them on Earth? Given that God knows who will pass and who will fail, and therefore who will get into Heaven, what's the point of Earthly existence at all? God knows who will, in the future, deserve to enter Heaven. So why doesn't God, with its knowledge, simply put those people into Heaven NOW? It could do so, if it wanted. Nothing would be lost. Suffering would be reduced.
God knows who will not enter Heaven God knows who will fail its tests. God knows, from even before the time when a person is born, whether or not they will pass its tests and enter heaven. Why then does God bother to create people who are to fail these tests? What's the point of the testing when it already knows the answers? Why not simply put those who will fail into hell, those who will pass into heaven, and not have to bother with all the confusion in between? But more importantly, why does God create people who it knows are going to fail tests and suffer torment in Hell?
My ViewI must admit that the atheist view was exactly my view when I was growing up.
This refutes the religious teaching which we have been exposed to Or goes on to say that God may not be as omnipotent, omniscient and omni benevolent as we expected him to be Or atleast says that God is playing a funny game with all of us like Age of Empires or Civilization or something. It drills holes in the futility of having concepts like Heaven and Hell.
I consider a possibility that all animate (and probably inanimate) souls are in constant state of evolution. We progress through different levels of consciousness and evolve into beings of higher levels based on our comprehension and ability requisite for our level. Progression probably happens when the being understands his present self and the next one. This is not exactly a test as there are no right answers. But probably there are roles to be played and tasks to be done for each one of us. How? Why? is beyond my comprehension as of yet.
#5. Evil is an Illusion Theodicy God's divine plan is good. What we see as evil is not really evil; rather, it is part of a divine design that is actually good. Our limitations prevent us from seeing the big picture
My ViewI have not read any atheist view on this Theodicy. But this theodicy negates a part of its own definition by saying that existence of evil is an illusion. By that logic we can even consider even good as an illusion. Therefore both are on equal terms.
Conclusion:Human thinking is abounding with misconceptions. We convince ourselves that what we know is right. Once we convince ourselves we do not subscribe to any other reason. But universe is rife with multitude of possibilities. Lets keep our eyes, ears, nose, minds and options open.
Credits :
Vexen.co.uk's post on Problem of Evil
Wikipedia entry on Theodicy